Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the next big thing in the world of technology. It is nothing less than a revolution in the field of modern software. As any piece of technology before, AI too has posed certain threats to the traditional industries and setups. One particular threat that we will be discussing today is whether AI translators can take over the human translating business around the world?
AI has taken up a prominent place in the human language translation industry and is predicted to make remarkable achievements in the future. According to market research firm Technavio, AI technology will increase dominance in the global translation market in the coming years. Current trends show that AI will be able to replace as many as 500,000 translators and will be used by thousands of language translating agencies. Moreover, there is historical evidence that if machines do the same amount of work as humans then sophisticated machinery can replace humans.
The Current Scenario of AI Translators
In the current setting, AI translators are seen to be better than Google Translate in the major languages (like German, Italian, French and Spanish). One example of an AI MT system is DeepL, an AI translation system that boasts much better results than Google Translate. However, the big engines like Google are capable of translating many more languages than DeepL. More than 100 languages, out of which 32% are in a conversational mode whereas almost 40% are visual translations.
A relatively new technology being used is neural machine technology (NMT). The machine produces neural connections from the data provided which is used for language translation. The system is generally easy to work with. It can help you achieve translations which are of the same level as humans, in a less complex environment. Another advantage of using these systems is that you don’t need to provide training as in the case of having human translators. One company that is seen as a rising star in the use of NMT is Lilt.
Will AI Replace Humans?
It may sound like AI can take over the human language translation industry, but there are still several loopholes that will affect the industry in many ways. Probably the biggest challenge that the Artificial Intelligence Industry faces currently is the cultural and emotional gap. No matter how sophisticated the AI machinery is, it is not able to understand the human language of emotions neither is it able to bridge cultural barriers. Another issue that arises when using translators instead of humans is when the context is misinterpreted. A small mistake can change the entire meaning of the sentence.
Therefore, in the coming years, AI would have to be able to adapt towards the emotions, tone of voice, and the context in which the sentence is being said along with the cultural aspects. The AI today functions according to the algorithms and codes which are designed by humans. The algorithms are designed and incorporated in web apps using PHP and MySQL web developmentservices.
Undeniably, it is through human efforts that AI has been able to carry out translations in the first place. Therefore, this technology can’t replace humans any time soon. However, it will reduce the number of professionals working in the human translation industry.
Moreover, it is possible that even if AI does reduce the number of professionals in the human translation industry human could still add value to the industry. They can do this by bridging the gap between the human and the machine. This could ultimately help with precisely interpreting the language regardless of any cultural barrier.
It seems that humans will stay play an important role in carrying out translations. For effective communication to take place it is important to keep in view the various aspects that make up a language. A very important part of communication in the context, if the context changes the entire meaning changes of the sentence.
In the present day, machines can’t interpret the languages keeping in view certain aspects. Until then, human professionals will still be considered as the most reliable means of conducting translations.
Arslan Hassan is an electrical engineer with a passion for writing, designing and anything tech-related. His educational background and experience in tech has fueled his passion for writing cutting-edge content. He occasionally writes blog articles for Dynamologic Solutions.
I love Amsterdam. This was probably my fifth time there. Localization conferences I like a bit less and have not gone to one in years. But my love of Amsterdam outweighed any other consideration and I decided to attend the one day Slatorcon Amsterdam 2019 conference on November 28, 2019 which was produced by Slator. And I am glad for this decision, having found the conference to be very good indeed. If you want more details, please continue reading this post.
The conference venue was excellent. The Andaz Amsterdam, Prinsengracht (a concept by Hyatt) is a lovely hotel situated on one of Amsterdam’s canals. This is a great hotel with beautiful rooms and fantastic service. I recommend this hotel highly.
The format of a one-day conference is a great idea. Having attended some LocWorld conferences which lasted for several days, I liked the quick-and-dirty aspect of this one. The talks were brief (about 20-25 minutes each) so my attention span wasn’t challenged too badly. There was ample time for networking and I can honestly say that I met as many of the 80+ delegates that I wanted to. The talks started at 12:30 so there were 1-2 hours of networking before the conference started. There was another round of networking in the middle and a three hour drinks session when the show wrapped up at 6:20 PM.
Food and Beverages
There was plenty of food and drinks during the networking sessions. The food looked very good and was in high demand by the attendees. I myself can’t attest to the quality of the food since I observe the laws of Kashrut and did not eat anything. The drinks session was well stocked with white/red wine and beer.
Conference Schedule Recap
The talks on the whole were good and here is a brief recap:
Andrew Smart got things started as the M.C. of the day and introduced the company that he co-founded, Slator. I found Andrew to be a very nice man with tons of goodwill and industry insight. Definitely a good guy to know.
Slator’s co-founder Florian Faes then took the stage and gave an impressive overview of the translation and localization industry. He covered the main players, the drivers, the industry verticals and spun his vision of the future of our industry. Strong stuff and very insightful.
The next talk was by Jimena Almendares of Intuit who spoke about her company’s foray into Mexico and discussed various aspects of localization of their accounting software. Interesting were the details about the local accounting laws and practices, which made the Mexican localization effort much more than just translating software resource files. Less interesting were details that had no relevance to the localization business (like how they smuggled in PCs for the Mexican employees who could not buy PCs locally for some reason). As an LSP, I got very limited benefit from this talk.
Andrew Bredenkamp of Acrolinx gave a very interesting talk about Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. Most of his talk was not relevant to the localization industry, but gave valuable insights into the current state of AI and where this technology is heading. I think that 25 minutes was way too little for Andrew and I would have welcomed an in-depth talk of several hours. Who knows, maybe it will happen in another time and space.
Patrick Prokesch of i5Invest gave an excellent presentation of Mergers and Acquisition (M&A) practices in general and in the localization business specifically. This was a powerful talk as it had very relevant information both for language industry company buyers and sellers. The information he discussed was particularly relevant to many people in the room as over 30% of the delegates were at the CEO level.
Esther Bond of Slator was short-changed so to speak and only had a few minutes due to scheduling issues. She discussed her activities as head of research at Slator. I had the chance to talk with Esther at the drinks session and heard about some of the exciting projects she is working on.
Harmut von Berg of LogMein spoke about the evolution of the 6-person localization team he is heading up. How the team consolidated after several mergers at the corporate level and how they managed to merge various departments in the process. I thought that he started out slow but gradually picked up speed to make a very effective presentation. He then ended with what I thought was a brilliant twist: he outlined some of the challenges that his department is faced with now and invited the conference attendants to propose ideas and help them with these efforts. One of the topics on his list was International SEO, which we will get to in a moment.
Florian got the panel started by discussing how large multinational companies approach the topic of international SEO. This topic seemed to energize the floor and several people had followup questions and comments. The consensus was that this is a very important issue. After all, what good is a localized website if it is not visible on the search engines? Andrea from Kayak said that her team worked with the internal SEO team to provide language support, but that the responsibility was with the SEO team. Vinicius of Bose and Al of Nike also seemed to indicate that this was not a top priority for their departments. Clearly, this is an an issue which requires close collaboration between localization and SEO teams. But ultimately, localization departments are not focused on this activity.
Another topic discussed in the panel was the use of MT in the localization work process. Clearly MT is being adopted and looked at by all of the large multinational companies. But the consensus on the panel was that this adaptation was in the early stages and did not yet go mainstream. My own thoughts on this are clear and it is my feeling that MT will not replace human translation in our lifetime.
I particularly enjoyed hearing Vinicius Britto (Bose) view on the customer-LSP relationship. LSPs should be solution-oriented. Customers should never have to chase the LSP and wait for the results to happen. I liked this no-nonsense approach.
The penultimate speaker was Michal Antczak of Paypal. I was a bit confused at a comment that Michal made at the start of his talk, that the views he is expressing are his own and are not those of Paypal. Nevertheless, Michal gave an interesting, somewhat tongue-in-cheek presentation about the relationship between LSPs and their customers.
The final talk was given by Yaron Kaufman of One Hour Translation. This was an effective talk on the selective use of NMT (Neural MT). Yaron made a compelling argument about the benefits of using NMT in a production environment and how companies can save between 30 and 70% of their translation costs. Yaron provided some metrics that supported his claim and made this workflow sound very real and feasible. What I did gather between the lines is that this approach is geared towards clients with millions of translation dollars in the their budget. One statement by Yaron that I found interesting (even as I disagree with it): MT will eventually, one day take over human translators. When? That Yaron could not predict.
Drinks and After Party
As I mentioned previously, there was a two hour drinks and networking session at the close of the conference. This was a very cool session which ended up lasting well over three hours. After so many talks and networking, we all deserved a relaxing drink. At about 9:30 PM the party relocated to Dante Kitchen and Bar which was a short 5 minute stroll from the Andaz. Did I say cool? Indeed it was. Unfortunately for me I had to cut out quickly and prepare for my early morning flight.
My networking experience
I met with a good number of the conference attendees. My own estimation of the breakdown: about 30% were LSPs, 30% were customers who buy localization services, 20% were tool vendors and the remaining percent were financial people and industry observers/consultants. One thing that stood out in my mind was the focus on website localization. I counted at least four vendors that sell website localization connectors-the magic software boxes that connect between a CMS and translation providers.
Josef Kubovsky is an industry consultant who invited me to visit him in Prague. I actually think I may take him up on his offer as we share numerous professional, personal and cultural interests.
I connected in a meaningful way with Balazc and Peter Farago of Smartling due to the Hungarian connection (my Mother was born in Budapest and Hungarian was my first language as a baby). We promised to set up a video conference soon to review their innovative website localization proxy software.
Lucy Taylor of Bayer had some interesting things to say about the life of a British expat living in Germany and about her work for the pharmaceutical giant. Lucy agreed with the idea that MT would replace human translators, at least for some tasks (like email and internal communications for example).
I enjoyed talking and drinking beers with Andrew Hickson of Ludejo BV, a Netherlands-based translation company. He gave me some interesting facts about life in Holland and the state of the localization industry in that country.
Amsterdam and Slatorcon were a great mix. I really hope that Slator does this in Amsterdam again real soon.
As the rate of digitization increases, data has become a very important currency in the business world.
In fact, business and technology advisor Bernard Marr explains that we produce 2.5 quintillion bytes of data on a daily basis — a number which has probably increased further since 2018. We generate this veritable mountain of data with our internet, social media, and smart technology usage, and even though just a portion of this data is harnessed for critical analysis, it’s still enough to power an entire sector. Maryville University’s look at the business data analytics industry reveals that the market is set to be worth $95 billion in the US and a whopping $203 billion worldwide by next year. This is bolstered by the rise in quality and quantity of data collected for businesses, which is expected to reach an 180 trillion gigabytes annually by 2025.
In the right hands, big data analytics has the power to change many, if not all industries. Some current real-world uses include the ability to detect diseases early, improve cybersecurity, and optimize campaigns. Considering that internet users and consumers don’t just speak one language, translation for different channels is an important element in collecting and analyzing data. But the question now is: how will translation continue to be shaped by data analytics and related technologies, such artificial intelligence (AI) and machine translation (MT)?
The entrance of AI and data analytics into the translation industry won’t signal the end of human translators. Rather, it will free up them up to focus on more complex tasks that require human cognizance and flair. GTS Translation Services previously outlined different kinds of work that can’t be successfully done by MT just yet — namely official documents, literary work, and scanned images or PDFs. These are the kinds of translation jobs that human translators can focus on while MT can take on lower-tier responsibilities, such as working on navigational tools. Another example is in the use of AI as chatbots in customer support. The speed in which they can translate allows them to respond to consumers almost instantaneously, which is a big plus. Humans, on the other hand, can focus on translating more valuable content like contracts, where language accuracy is critical.
‘AI-powered, human-refined’ quality
That said, one of the biggest criticisms against MT is that it too often lacks accuracy when it comes to more complex material. We’ve all seen how tools like Google Translate fumble with winding sentences — not to mention that it sounds awkward or too formal, which doesn’t fit well in different cultural contexts. A Lisbon-based startup, Unbabel, has come up with a logical solution to this ongoing problem, which is to combine the power of AI with the skill level of humans. To date, Unbabel employs 55,000 human translators, who work to “refine” translated texts that first go through their translation engines. This ensures the native and subjective quality of language that fits within certain contexts, while also being delivered at faster speeds.
So far, only human translators have shown success in speech-to-speech translation. One common example is the Q&A portion of international beauty pageants, where a professional has to translate a judge’s question to the contestant’s native tongue and her answer back to English. This type of instant speech-to-speech translation is essentially the goal of the Chinese tech company Baidu with their unveiling of an AI-powered translation tool last October. Baidu’s Simultaneous Translation and Anticipation and Controllable Latency (STACL) can translate speech from one language to another to allow for smooth conversation between people using different languages. However, the analytics tool can only translate between Chinese, English, and German currently. But with further research and development, imagine what this can do for businesses, academics, or the travel industry when the tool gets more refined in the future.
It’s certainly a very exciting time to be in the translation industry. Human translators can rest assured that they won’t be replaced by software or robots anytime soon. However, there’s a lot more data to collect, store, and analyze in the future that can continue enhancing machine translation and change the industry forever.
Technology Update created by Joni Bithell for gts-translation.com